An article published in Injury
Prevention Magazine found that “Driver
education or communication campaigns cannot be expected to radically
change a
young person…” The article instead recommended a
combination of communication and enforcement.
Minnesota’s
traffic calming page found that while education is
“fairly cost effective” it “typically
solves the problem only in the short term.”
An article published in
Mobilities magazine entitled No
Accident: Traffic and Pedestrians in the Modern City notes
that “little
evidence exists on pedestrian education effectiveness
whereas … traffic
modification has shown to be more effective.”
|
|
On the Streets

A recent
study
done by ATSSA found a direct correlation between the 2006 increase in
federal aid for roadway safety projects and the decline in roadway
fatalities every year since. Read
more here. |
| What makes
traffic calming work? |
|
Premiering |
| The American Journal of Public
Health found that traffic
calming has proven far more effective in reducing
pedestrian injuries than road safety education, which has been unable
to exert meaningful changes. |
|
 |
Physical traffic
calming leaves drivers with no choice but to slow
down. When physical devices, such as speed
humps, are placed at
appropriate intervals, they compel drivers to slow down and drive at
safer speeds. Radar speed signs, unlike static signage, encourage
drivers to slow down by making them aware of their individual behavior.
By
physically slowing
vehicle speeds, traffic calming reduces both the number and severity of
pedestrian crashes. Even if a crash does occur on a traffic calmed
street, lower speed crashes are less likely to seriously injure or kill
those involved. |
|
Congestions
cost the US almost $90 billion in 2009, including myriad traffic
accidents and 2.8 billion gallons of wasted fuel.
In urban areas, much
of the traffic is caused by cars circling for parking. In San Francisco
for example, 30% of cars on the road are spot seekers. |
| What should
traffic calming include? |
|
Several
new technologies aim to help reduce congestion by helping
people find
parking faster. Some examples? SFPark, NJ ParkNet and NY &
Boston’s PrimoSpot. Read
more here. |
There
are three “E”s that are often referred to in
traffic
calming: Engineering, Education, and Enforcement. Traffic
calming
is often most effective when more than one of these components are used.
|
|
| Engineering
involves modifications to the street such as installing a traffic
circle or speed
table to encourage drivers to reduce their speeds.
Education includes making residents more aware of their behavior and of
the dangers of speeding. Enforcement can involve increased levels of
law enforcement as well as tracking the effectiveness of traffic
calming solutions. |
|
Did you know?
 |
| Effects of traffic calming |
|
The Texas
DOT found radar
trailer units to be the most effective solutions tested to
slow traffic in work zones. Read
more. |
| Unlike
educational campaigns on their own, traffic
calming has proven effective time and time again. |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Logix tidbits

We will be exhibiting our traffic calming
solutions this summer at the ITE International
Conference in Vancouver, BC and the
APWA
International Public Works Exposition in Boston, MA.
We’d love to see you there! |